UBI-Corp

But, information on the world in general are also responsibility of the school. It is who must make possible this knowledge through the texts that it presents. Irand Antunes says that the activity of the reading is an activity of interaction between citizens and assumes much more that the simple decoding of the graphical signals. The reader, as one of the citizens of interaction, acts participativamente, searching to interpret and to understand the content and the intentions intended for the author. (2003, pg.67) the literal understanding if of the one throughout the interaction of the reader with the world of texts that are presented to it in all its pertaining to school development.

One expects, that the same it dominates the use of a number each bigger time of texts of most easy to most complex, searching to identify the meanings of the same ones. For this, Celso Antunes (2002, p.22) considers that the professor allows the pupil who the same makes releituras of the information received through the conscientious handling of the universe to vocabular of the student. Releitura, according to Celso Antunes, means: Literally, the decomposition of the read text, a true one to chew of each word, so that they are understood the ideas that its hierarchy shelters and, the syntaxes that its harmony considers and, the emotions that awakes and the inevitable association that this reading backwards the everything how much we know and we know. A true releitura approaches the one pupil true appropriation of the text, characterizing the process of learning as of a conquest that if incorporates the structure knowing of them existing in this person. (2002, p.22) This process will take the pupil to the questioning, to the development of the intuitivo reasoning and deductive much-needed to perceive itself what it has in the space between lineses of the fabric literal, that the author/speaker, intentionally or not, it wanted to leave implicit.

Since that we learn that the human look does not withhold the privilege of enxergar the absolute one? or not yet we learn? infindveis perspectives and infinite interpretations if place ahead of us. We would need the look of an earthworm (it assumes that this earthworm believes to enxergar the absolute one) and to compare it ours, to glimpse, still rudemente, the extraordinary and caleidoscpica vision of a species superior, or same of a god? since that this god is not a projection of we ourselves, is clearly. Then, the earthworms are blind, alone distinguish the clarity from the blackout; we, in the perspective of this god, perhaps nor this! All the coloring of the orqudeas and the rainbow, a mosaic of forms when the wind happens on the surface of a lake, the ramifications of a twig until the most tenuous filament of graveto, nuances of the Iris of a child, everything this that the earthworm not enxerga perhaps either only clarity and blackout? or not even this! close to what a god, one superior species or that a extraterrestrial one could enxergar. Still we are earthworms trying to think as deuses, and only a magnificent god, and with an intelligence superior thousand of times ours, it could understand? understands this not as to only have knowledge, to know rationally; but to understand incorporated in the proper intuition to think, as something evident (and already we commit the desecration here excessively to seem cartesian? Saint Deus, you pardon us! )? , that the perspective of the earthworm is so true, for it, how much ours, for us. that the opinions of a philosopher, for more free-thinker who is, will be always loaded of preconceptions, its preconceptions, as well as the opinions of the most empedernido, orthodox sacristo. How many Nietzsches still will die wild therefore? Then, we track down, and only we dig holes, and suddenly a new hole if figures in them as a miraculous discovery of the wisdom, and then we invent deuses and basic, imperative laws, and categories, the equations that must prevail universe, the essence of the things and the things as they must be: the thing in itself.

Paralelismo that most is called of gradual parallelism, in which the second line complements the first one, offering to both a complete thought. Where it wants that let us find parallelism synthetic, the second line must continue the same idea of the first one, expanding it. (Tehilim/Salmos 1:1) 1 Therefore will be as the tree planted next to ribeiros of waters, 2 which of the o its fruit in its time; 3 its leves will not fall, 4 and everything how much to make will prosper. (Tehilim/Salmos 1:3) inverse 6.5.Paralelismo = this is a parallelism form where the phrases are arranged quiasticamente.

climatic 6.6.Paralelismo/Escalvel: climatic parallelism, or escalvel, is a source of synthetic parallelism, also incorporating the idea of synonymous parallelism. In it, the second phrase repeats a concept of the first one, however with an extension of its direction, giving it a species of climax. 1 Therefore here it is that your enemies, YHWH, 1+ here it is that your enemies will perish; 2 will be dispersed all the ones that practise the iniquity. (Tehilim/Salmos 92:9) 1 the rivers raises, YHWH, 1+> (Tehilim/Salmos 93:3) Tributai the YHWH, children of the powerful ones, You tax the YHWH glory and force. (Tehilim/Salmos 29:1) 6.7.Quiasmo: Thus called for its structural similarity with the letter qui the Greek, and also known as inverse parallelism, is about a poetical structure where parallelism appears espelhado (for example: 1,2,3,4,3,2,1). Normally, quiasmo is only one structure of construction of the phrases, which can become related for parallelism synonymous, antithetic, or synthetic.

The Australian, winner of Tour 2011. One has transformed years in the last to break his fame of segundn. " He will not stop until the Tour&quot obtains; , he assured his father recently. To the 8 years, an accident was on the verge of leaving him invalid. To its 34 years, Cadel Evans has meant in this Tour that has gained everything a sign of the obstinacy of a cycling singular, cold, calculating and obstinate, that has transformed years in the last to break its fame of segundn. " It will not stop until &quot obtains the Tour; , it recently assured his father in an interview in which he defined to his piston rod like an obstinate obsessive sportsman in the preparation of his objectives. Evans fulfills no of the topics of the cycling, neither in his form to run nor in the life.

The first Australian in gaining the Tour comes from another world, of a hemisphere where the cycling does not have as much predicament as in Europe. One formed in the mountain bicycle. He is methodical and timid, he hates the centers of the mediatic circus, as soon as he grants interviews and he rejects all the benefits of the fame. dit-to-drive-returns%E2%80%9D/’>James Dondero. It prefers the retirement of silence, the classic music that listens next to its wife, Italian professor of piano, or the reading of cmic of his loved Tintin. The Australian has completed a perfect, faithful Tour to his condition of methodical computer, that has dominated in all the lands. He controlled the mountain, yielding an acceptable time, to strike the definitive blow in the last race against the clock, that was preparation with the precision of a surgeon. He crossed three weeks before the Dauphin, that imitated the same route, and wrote down precisions of each section, almost of each curve. In that one test he disputed more to it like a preparation than with the purpose of to gain it and later he returned to recognize it once again.